A simple solution for routing specific docker containers through a WireGuard VPN using only two simple systemd-networkd files, no cumbersome
A simple solution for routing specific docker containers through a WireGuard VPN using only two simple systemd-networkd files, no cumbersome
Thanks for the article, very simple and works well.
Per your warning, I’ve added the following to the .network file for my ethernet interface to handle container traffic routing if the WireGuard interface is somehow destroyed:
[Route] Destination=0.0.0.0/0 Type=blackhole Metric=1 Table=242
This seems to do the trick after a test using ip link set down dev wg1. I can no longer curl nor ping from within the container until the wg1 device and its route are restored.
I’m glad that the article was helpful!
And thank you for the config tip. Using metrics looks very clean and simple. I’ll test it on my machine when I get around to it and add it to the article
Sorry that it took so long. I finally tested your solution, it seems to work for me as well! I added it to the article. Thanks again!
This is exactly what I’ve been looking for where there exists a kill-switch which is active regardless of the state of the Wireguard connection. Usually most other tutorials setup a kill-switch in the Wireguard-config which is only active when there is a connection. Changing the private key, hostname (IP, or address) exposes all traffic sent through.
Speaking of the solution, would it be possible to make a shell script of all the steps which users can easily run to set up everything? And perhaps make a git of it as well? Moreover, port forwarding from a service, such as a BitTorrent container, works out-of-the-box without doing anything? Let’s say my VPN provider gives me port 42891, I simply only have to setup that port in the BitTorrent client and port forwarding should work?
Creating a script that generates the two systemd-networkd files from an existing wg-quick config is an interesting idea that should definitely be possible. If I get around to it, I’ll be sure to put it here!
Port forwarding through the VPN works almost out of the box, you’ll still have to tell docker to publish the corresponding ports as you normally would, e.g. using
-p 1234:80 in a Docker call or
ports: - "1234:80"
in a Docker Compose file would make port 80 inside the container available as port 1234 through the VPN.
Both can be the same, so if your VPN provider gives you port 42891, run the container with port 42891 and use
42891:42891 as port option.
I added a explaination for that to the article. Thanks for the feedback!
Thank you very much for the additional information concerning port forwarding I’ll look more into this in the coming week. What’s your take on implementing a firewall with the setup? Is it really needed given if you have a firewall setup for the system outside of the Docker containers?
To harden the security, I’m thinking about encrypting the private key. However, I see that PostUp is not possible to run with systemd-networkd given error: " Unknown key name ‘PostUp’ in section ‘WireGuard’, ignoring." (inspiration from archlinux wiki). So please let me know if you can think of any solution to accomplish this with pass.
Reading from your article: " Note that published ports of tunneled containers are not reachable on
localhost , only through the VPN. Sadly, I haven’t yet found a possibility to fix that."
This is actually possible with multi-host-networking. The easiest way is to create two networks and add them both to the second container which wants to access ports from the first container.
networks: default: tunneled0: ipam: config: - subnet: 10.123.0.0/16 services: container1: image: .... networks: tunneled0: container2: image: ... networks: - default - tunneled0
Here is a real-world example which I use where I’ve added three networks to get an inter-container network. ruTorrent is running in the front network (tunneled0) and expose port 80 and 5000 to inter network and then back network which NGINX access to get the reverse proxy work.
Real world example
version: "3.8" networks: tunneled0: ipam: config: - subnet: 10.123.0.0/16 inter: name: inter driver: bridge internal: true driver_opts: com.docker.network.bridge.name: dockerinter back: name: back driver: bridge driver_opts: com.docker.network.bridge.name: dockerback rutorrent: image: linuxserver/rutorrent expose: - "80" #(ruTorrent web) - "5000" #(ruTorrent SCGI) networks: - tunneled0 - inter ... swag: image: linuxserver/swag cap_add: - NET_ADMIN environment: ... networks: - back - inter ports: - "443:443" ...
What’s your take on implementing a firewall with the setup? Is it really needed given if you have a firewall setup for the system outside of the Docker containers?
I’m no expert on that, you should have a firewall somewhere in front of Docker, e.g. I have Docker running on my home server and my router is doing the firewalling.
So please let me know if you can think of any solution to accomplish this with pass.
I haven’t tried it, but you should be able to not set the private key in the .netdev file and then use a custom oneshot systemd unit that runs the command used in PostUp from the ArchWiki on startup to enter the key.
This is actually possible with multi-host-networking . The easiest way is to create two networks and add them both to the second container which wants to access ports from the first container.
Thank you very much! That solutions seems to work. I’ll add it to the blog post when I get around to it.
I have a firewall setup in my router and have setup iptables for my server outside docker. I was thinking about if it is needed to add iptables rules inside the docker setup as well. But I guess it isn’t and the reason for why most vpn-clients have it is probably to use it as a kill-switch.
Hello! first of all, thanks for the guide. It is exactly the kind of approach I was looking for when rerouting docker containers. I have a problem though: even though I can
$ sudo curl -4 --interface wg0 icanhazip.com and it gives me the VPN IP, when I add it to a docker network and attach it to a container (via portainer, which is how I am managing containers) and enter it, it has no connection. Using
$ networkctl status wg0 shows it’s status as “routable (configured)”. I can connect to the same peer in the same local network using another user from the same (self-hosted) VPN peer. Oh, also, the peer of access is using Algo (https://github.com/trailofbits/algo/issues) to manage VPN profiles (which adds a layer of complexity to the equation, as it uses PresharedKeys along with Public and Private ones).
Do you have any idea where I might be falling short?
Once again, thank you.
@rodrigorodrigo, it sounds like a routing issue. Can you show me your
85-wg0.network file and your Algo-generated config file without the pub/priv key and endpoint?
Sure thing @Maren, thanks for taking the time to help. Here are both files that compose the networkd config, as well as the Algo-generated config file:
user@server:/etc/systemd/network$ cat /etc/systemd/network/85-wg0.network [Match] Name=wg0 [Network] Address = IPv4, IPv6 [RoutingPolicyRule] From = 10.123.0.0/16 Table = 242 [Route] Gateway = IPv4, IPv6 (same as Network / Address) Table = 242 [Route] Destination = 0.0.0.0/0 Type = blackhole Metric = 1 Table = 242
user@server:/etc/systemd/network$ cat /etc/systemd/network/80-wg0.netdev [NetDev] Name = wg0 Kind = wireguard Description = WireGuard VPN [WireGuard] PrivateKey = privkey [WireGuardPeer] PublicKey = publicKey PresharedKey = PresharedKey AllowedIPs = 0.0.0.0/0 Endpoint= VPNIP:PORT
user@VpnPeer: cat ~/algo/configs/config/wireguard/nas.conf [Interface] PrivateKey = PrivKey Address = IPV4, IPV6 DNS = DNSIPv4, DNSIPv6 [Peer] PublicKey = PublicKey PresharedKey = PresharedKey AllowedIPs = 0.0.0.0/0,::/0 Endpoint = IP:port
I believe everything is right, I have double (tripled, quadrupled) checked everything according to the guide.
EDIT: I have just noticed that I have a DNS parameter that is not on the guide. It was included in the Algo profile so I just inserted it there.
I think DietPi has a bugged version of networkd that seems to be floating around. It seemed to restart successfully but never establish. I tried the same approach on Ubuntu Mate and at least got further (Connection established, handshake, basic tests).
I did run into issue on my Ubuntu Mate build though. wg0 can curl a request properly but my docker tunneled requests all fail to resolve. Not sure if I am missing something about DNS but literally nothing can escape the docker if I set its network to tunneled.
Any thoughts appreciated but I am stopping working on this for the day … ha
I’ve been banging my head on this one. Trying to set this up on DietPi - ran their client type install for wireguard. I think the type is only more or less changes for config.
Feel free to take a look if you want: https://dietpi.com/phpbb/viewtopic.php?p=16308#p16308
I can’t seem to establish a connection through my wg0.
Config values populated from auto-genned mullvad wireguard file
[NetDev] Name = wg0 Kind = wireguard Description = WireGuard VPN [WireGuard] PrivateKey = <PVKey> [WireGuardPeer] PublicKey = <PubKey> AllowedIPs = 0.0.0.0/0,::0/0 Endpoint= <EPIP:PORT>
[Match] Name=wg0 [Network] Address = IPV4/CIDR Address = IPV6/CIDR [RoutingPolicyRule] From = 10.123.0.0/16 Table = 242 [Route] Gateway = IPV4/CIDR -- Same as Network Gatewau = IPV6/CIDR -- Same as Network Table = 242 [Route] Destination = 0.0.0.0/0 Type = blackhole Metric = 1 Table = 242
IDX LINK TYPE OPERATIONAL SETUP 1 lo loopback carrier unmanaged 2 eth0 ether off unmanaged 3 wlan0 wlan routable unmanaged 4 wg0 wireguard off unmanaged 5 br-dbc8c1c558d9 bridge no-carrier unmanaged 6 docker0 bridge no-carrier unmanaged
sudo curl -4 --interface wg0 icanhazip.com curl: (7) Couldn't connect to server sudo curl -4 --interface wlan0 icanhazip.com MY.IP.SERVER.IP.NON.VPN
I dunno if I missed something here - should I have to set any config directly with wireguard? I think networkd should have just picked it up from files.
Anyways - thoughts?
Unsure how to get any logs - I wonder if its related to resolvconf and networkd
In 85-wg0.network, there is a typo in the second Gateway (Gatewau)… Furthermore, try to use one Address and Gateway first. In my case, I had to use a minor change between them where address have /16 at the end, while Gateway does not (only IP as example 10.100.100.100).
I appreciate the reply. The typo was only on here (I did some edits on my post and the remote and tried to keep them in sync). I will update it here but you were right that its a typo on the website.
That said - the wg0 network interface is working perfectly as described by this file.
It is only docker that is failing to make it to the internet.
Here is a cleaned snapshot direct from the computer of info I find relevant - also, I know there are keys and IPs, I scrambled them.
Testing out current setup
feeder@ubuntu-mate:~$ sudo curl -4 --interface wg0 https://icanhazip.com 126.96.36.199 //fake vpn ip feeder@ubuntu-mate:~$ sudo curl -4 https://icanhazip.com 188.8.131.52 // fake public ip feeder@ubuntu-mate:~$ sudo docker exec -it 7d87c09e1c9a /bin/bash root@7d87c09e1c9a:/# curl -4 https://icanhazip.com --verbose * Could not resolve host: icanhazip.com * Closing connection 0 curl: (6) Could not resolve host: icanhazip.com
Checking IP inside Docker Container
root@7d87c09e1c9a:/# cat /etc/hosts 127.0.0.1 localhost ::1 localhost ip6-localhost ip6-loopback fe00::0 ip6-localnet ff00::0 ip6-mcastprefix ff02::1 ip6-allnodes ff02::2 ip6-allrouters 10.123.0.2 7d87c09e1c9a root@7d87c09e1c9a:/# exit exit
feeder@ubuntu-mate:~$ cat compose/feeder/docker-compose.yml version: "3.7" networks: tunneled0: ipam: config: - subnet: 10.123.0.0/16 inter: driver: bridge internal: true driver_opts: com.docker.network.bridge.name: dockerinter back: driver: bridge driver_opts: com.docker.network.bridge.name: dockerback services: something: image: linuxserver/something container_name: something dns: "184.108.40.206" /// I tried it with and without dns environment: - PUID=1000 - PGID=1000 - TZ=America/Chicago volumes: - ./config:/config ports: - 6789:6789 networks: - tunneled0 restart: unless-stopped
feeder@ubuntu-mate:~$ sudo wg interface: wg0 public key: 6uE0bdqHNZpgvt75qGaXYJxfSJ6ACiWg8zElTpogcls= // scrambled key - matches public key that pairs to the private key of my wg-quick private key: (hidden) listening port: 43750 peer: Z67ACpoiW0YHNGabJ6tgE5JxfSXpgv8zFlTdqqugcls= // scrambled key - matches WQ Quick and 80-wg0.netdev endpoint: 220.127.116.11:51820 // fake VPN endpoint (scrambled mullvad), matches 80-wg0.netdev allowed ips: ::/0, 0.0.0.0/0 latest handshake: 2 minutes, 48 seconds ago transfer: 22.71 KiB received, 9.68 KiB sent
feeder@ubuntu-mate:~$ networkctl IDX LINK TYPE OPERATIONAL SETUP 1 lo loopback carrier unmanaged 2 eth0 ether routable unmanaged 3 wlan0 wlan no-carrier unmanaged 4 wg0 wireguard routable configured 5 docker0 bridge no-carrier unmanaged 6 br-5d292cc9a7f9 bridge no-carrier unmanaged 7 br-e0c2770b5c6a bridge routable unmanaged 9 veth36fae70 ether degraded unmanaged
feeder@ubuntu-mate:~$ cat /etc/systemd/network/80-wg0.netdev [NetDev] Name = wg0 Kind = wireguard Description = WireGuard VPN [WireGuard] PrivateKey = 94gsq5SN2JGYC2hzVs/u1hVPNBJFXLMt4ZgZDFleOnY= // scrambled mullvad key straight from wg quick - is the private key pair to public key output in wg command [WireGuardPeer] PublicKey = Z67ACpoiW0YHNGabJ6tgE5JxfSXpgv8zFlTdqqugcls= // scrambled mullvad key straight from wg quick - matches output of wg AllowedIPs = 0.0.0.0/0,::0/0 Endpoint= 18.104.22.168:51820 // scrambled vpn endpoint straight from wg-quick matches wg output
feeder@ubuntu-mate:~$ cat /etc/systemd/network/85-wg0.network [Match] Name=wg0 [Network] Address = 10.22.33.44/32 // straight from wg-quick, scrambled Address = fde0:ccfc:cfcc:ff01::2:1a17/128 // straight from wg-quick, scrambled [RoutingPolicyRule] From = 10.123.0.0/16 Table = 242 [Route] Gateway = 10.22.33.44/32 // straight from wg-quick, scrambled Gateway = fde0:ccfc:cfcc:ff01::2:1a17/128 // straight from wg-quick, scrambled Table = 242 [Route] Destination = 0.0.0.0/0 Type = blackhole Metric = 1 Table = 242
I still think this is a routing issue. Could you please try to do what I recommended in the last post? Remove
/128 from Gateway so you get the following in your cat 85-wg0.network file:
[Match] Name = wg0 [Network] Address = 10.22.33.44/32 Address = fde0:ccfc:cfcc:ff01::2:1a17/128 [RoutingPolicyRule] From = 10.123.0.0/16 Table = 242 [Route] Gateway = 10.22.33.44 Gateway = fde0:ccfc:cfcc:ff01::2:1a17 Table = 242 [Route] Destination = 0.0.0.0/0 Type = blackhole Metric = 1 Table = 242
Went ahead and tried that out - I assumed since the connection is working, just not from docker it wouldn’t have an impact.
Switched, restarted networkd and even rebooted - docker still can not connect to icanhazip.com
Thanks for the idea though.
I faced the same issue as you where my wg0 connection was up and running, but my docker didn’t have any internet connection. Doing what I told you solved the issue for me. Unfortunately that didn’t solve it for you. I guess you have not added any kernel parameters to /etc/sysctl.conf, changed iptables rules etc., correct?